Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries. (2024)

Aarden, E. (2016). Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries. Critical Policy Studies, 10(2), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704

Aarden, Erik. / Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries. in: Critical Policy Studies. 2016 ; Band 10, Nr. 2. S. 216-234.

@article{ef93f9a692f64de68c24d64eede59fe9,

title = "Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries.",

abstract = "While developments in genetic medicine are widely considered to bring forward pressing policy challenges, the question how genetic diagnostics are integrated into and distributed within existing health-care infrastructures has virtually been ignored. This paper addresses the distribution of genetic diagnostics through the framework of bioconstitutionalism, which suggests that basic categories for the allocation of rights and duties in law and policymaking are redefined together with and through specific scientific and technological ways of understanding and intervening in life. The paper thus analyzes the coproduction of diagnostic and distributive approaches to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a hereditary form of high cholesterol, in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany. It describes how a commitment to a genetically narrow screening program in the Netherlands reflects a commitment to providing care to specific subcommunities of people at risk; how a broad and predominantly phenotypic understanding of FH in the United Kingdom can be understood in terms of an emphasis on comprehensive population coverage and how the framing of high cholesterol as a regular risk factor in Germany expresses a rule-bound notion of justice. The paper thus suggests that particular culturally situated imaginations of distributive justice in the distribution of health-care resources underwrite the formation of diagnostic and distributive arrangements. The paper thereby proposes that bioconstitutionalism can provide a valuable contribution to (comparative) health policy analysis by lying bare how policies affect individual access to medical care.",

keywords = "health policy, comparative analysis, genetics, bioconstitutionalism, Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, distributive justice, SYSTEM, HEALTH-INSURANCE, CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE, CARE",

author = "Erik Aarden",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "216--234",

journal = "Critical Policy Studies",

issn = "1946-0171",

publisher = "Routledge, Taylor & Francis",

number = "2",

}

Aarden, E 2016, 'Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries.', Critical Policy Studies, Jg. 10, Nr. 2, S. 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704

Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries. / Aarden, Erik.

in: Critical Policy Studies, Band 10, Nr. 2, 2016, S. 216-234.

Veröffentlichungen: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Peer Reviewed

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries.

AU - Aarden, Erik

N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - While developments in genetic medicine are widely considered to bring forward pressing policy challenges, the question how genetic diagnostics are integrated into and distributed within existing health-care infrastructures has virtually been ignored. This paper addresses the distribution of genetic diagnostics through the framework of bioconstitutionalism, which suggests that basic categories for the allocation of rights and duties in law and policymaking are redefined together with and through specific scientific and technological ways of understanding and intervening in life. The paper thus analyzes the coproduction of diagnostic and distributive approaches to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a hereditary form of high cholesterol, in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany. It describes how a commitment to a genetically narrow screening program in the Netherlands reflects a commitment to providing care to specific subcommunities of people at risk; how a broad and predominantly phenotypic understanding of FH in the United Kingdom can be understood in terms of an emphasis on comprehensive population coverage and how the framing of high cholesterol as a regular risk factor in Germany expresses a rule-bound notion of justice. The paper thus suggests that particular culturally situated imaginations of distributive justice in the distribution of health-care resources underwrite the formation of diagnostic and distributive arrangements. The paper thereby proposes that bioconstitutionalism can provide a valuable contribution to (comparative) health policy analysis by lying bare how policies affect individual access to medical care.

AB - While developments in genetic medicine are widely considered to bring forward pressing policy challenges, the question how genetic diagnostics are integrated into and distributed within existing health-care infrastructures has virtually been ignored. This paper addresses the distribution of genetic diagnostics through the framework of bioconstitutionalism, which suggests that basic categories for the allocation of rights and duties in law and policymaking are redefined together with and through specific scientific and technological ways of understanding and intervening in life. The paper thus analyzes the coproduction of diagnostic and distributive approaches to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a hereditary form of high cholesterol, in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany. It describes how a commitment to a genetically narrow screening program in the Netherlands reflects a commitment to providing care to specific subcommunities of people at risk; how a broad and predominantly phenotypic understanding of FH in the United Kingdom can be understood in terms of an emphasis on comprehensive population coverage and how the framing of high cholesterol as a regular risk factor in Germany expresses a rule-bound notion of justice. The paper thus suggests that particular culturally situated imaginations of distributive justice in the distribution of health-care resources underwrite the formation of diagnostic and distributive arrangements. The paper thereby proposes that bioconstitutionalism can provide a valuable contribution to (comparative) health policy analysis by lying bare how policies affect individual access to medical care.

KW - health policy

KW - comparative analysis

KW - genetics

KW - bioconstitutionalism

KW - Netherlands

KW - Germany

KW - United Kingdom

KW - distributive justice

KW - SYSTEM

KW - HEALTH-INSURANCE

KW - CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE

KW - CARE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930373245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704

DO - 10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 216

EP - 234

JO - Critical Policy Studies

JF - Critical Policy Studies

SN - 1946-0171

IS - 2

ER -

Aarden E. Constitutions of Justice in Genetic Medicine: Distributing Diagnostics for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Three European Countries. Critical Policy Studies. 2016;10(2):216-234. Epub 2015 Jun 1. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2015.1024704